Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Should Cloning be Introduced into Everyday Medicine?

Cloning is a highly controversial topic. It was a major breakthrough when the Scottish produced the first successful cloned sheep, however, instead of introducing an advance in medicine, it created a highly debated issue.

There are three main types of cloning: DNA Cloning, Reproductive Cloning, and Therapeutic Cloning. DNA cloning takes one or more fragments of DNA and produces multiple copies of that section of DNA either in vitro or in vivo. Reproductive Cloning uses a somatic cell and egg to produce an identical, cloned version of the original organism. Therapeutic Cloning is similar to Reproductive Cloning in which a somatic cell and egg is used to create an organ, such as a liver (instead of a new, identical organism).

Cloning could be beneficial for our society in several different ways. This procedure could be used to combat a disease-ridden organ, or copy a specific gene some organisms carry which could improve life. Cloning could also be a way of reproduction for females who cannot have kids. Cloning opens many doors to producing a “perfect life”, however, there are several negative connotations surrounding cloning.

Further research needs to be conducted in order to strengthen the positive feedback surrounding cloning; the majority of the cases dealing with cloning have been unsuccessful. Many cases have produced results revealing cloned organisms having shorter lives, tumor infested organs, and other such malfunctions a normal, healthy produced individual would not usually face. There has been inconclusive data surrounding the health of cloned organisms as many do not live long enough to show results. Along with the several risks surrounding cloning, it is unethical to produce an identical organism. Every organism is unique and carries characteristics, good or bad, which define themselves. When cloning an organism, we would be able to choose which characteristics are wanted in this new individual, therefore making the clone a better species than the original. This is unethical because we would be regarding the clones as a better species. With the ability to create the “better species” people could pay a doctor to create a specific genome for their offspring which can be related to buying a human. In today’s society, it is unethical to buy a human which is why many people, including myself, see cloning as immoral.




2 comments:

  1. I agree with your statement that cloning could potentially lead to serious problems and have serious consequences on society. The main one that comes to mind is eugenics, when we try to select against certain traits in order to produce a "better" human species. Scientists do not have a positive history with eugenics, and cloning could further add to that negative history. It raises the question then about what should cloning really be used for? There are potential therapeutic uses in medicine, but I agree that more research needs to be done in order to strengthen any potential therapeutic use. It is interesting that there hasn't been very much progress made in regards to cloning because of the ethical issues surrounding it, which in a way is showing a positive side of the scientific field in general that there are scientists who are thinking about the ethical issues surrounding their research.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Awesome article! I have gradually become fan of your article and would like to suggest putting some new updates to make it more effective.We provide Dissertation Proofreading Services and Dissertation Editing Services to Ph.D.writers. Enquire today about improving your Dissertation Writing.

    ReplyDelete